![]() ![]() It’s from this space that Andrews claims that labor history needs to include the environment, and that a history of Ludlow needs to include the history of Colorado coal and global labor and energy trends (16).Īndrews is concerned with a few types of relationships. ![]() So while culture pops up, Killing for Coal includes everything from the environment to migrant histories to “workspaces.” Andrew himself claims to specialize in environmental and social history, and it shows in his text. Andrew aims to give context for the Massacre, to explore how it fit in a larger historical context. decries, but veers away from Womack’s call for work-centered history in favor of something more sprawling and interdisciplinary. ![]() The book definitely differs from the “social histories” that emphasize “culture” that John Womack, Jr. Andrews’s Killing for Coal: America’s Deadliest Labor War offers a long and wide view of the Ludlow Massacre in 1914. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |